Re: to min, seriously

de Anonymous 11/25/2007 09:48






THIS UNWANTED GARBAGE ORIGINATED FROM AND BROUGHT TO YOU COURTESY OF:

PATRICK PARIS -- CONVICTED SEX OFFENDER
PATRICK PARIS -- SHITBAG FLOODER
PATRICK PARIS -- THE HUMAN MAGGOT
PATRICK PARIS -- SYPHILITIC PERVERT




In article <KOK7OQI538651.5396759259@anonymous.poster>
Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
>
> On 26 Oct 2005, anon <anon@anon> wrote:
> > i read in some groups you post to, like here, and in the sci hierarchy .
> >my question is, why don't you ever reply to the aussie " buffoon " that stalks
> >you so much ?
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> Hmmm...
>
> Firstly, I'm not sure *why* you're inquiring?

To prove your a scumbag.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: Serious question, related to this "Pangborn" stuff

In article <FKGYEJYI38642.4598611111@reece.net.au>
Thrasher Remailer <thrasher@reece.net.au> wrote:
>
> you know, all you have to do is use common sense and have a bit of decency and
when somebody named john smith points out that he is being harassed in some
newsgroup you block mail to that newsgroup that mentions john smith.
>
> sure, there might be another john smith using the newsgroup, but the chances are
there is not and even if there is isn't it worth protecting the victim john smith
at the expense of the other john smith seeing his name in the newsgroup if it
happened to be mentioned in a message that went through your remailer, which is
pretty unlikely since this john smith is not a victim so posts in the newsgroup
mentioning his name would probably come directly from the sender. and what are the
chances that both john smiths would be mentioned in posts coming through your
remailer at about the same time? pretty remote i would say.
>
> it seems pretty simple to me and if you cannot see it maybe it is because you do
not want to see it.
>
> it is clear to me as an observer that remailer operators are by and large
children and mentally ill 'adults'.
>
> i wish Frog would return.
>
> failing that I hope eelbash will continue rather than take another vacation.
>
> aside from those two i have nothing but contempt for remailer operators and
think that pangborn is right and they are a lot of sickos playing with toys, but
with toys that can hurt people, and maybe it is best if there is one too many free
insane speech incidents and finally after one more terrorist attack some demagogic
privacy-hating politician manages to get a law passed to shut down these pathetic
and disgusting children's toys because that is all they are.
>
> of course all you mentally ill children will blame Frog rather than yourselves.

We still know this is you Eelbash. Try harder next time.

<<==========>>

Subject: Re: please post all nym keys

On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, remailer@invalid.com wrote:
>-----BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-----
>Message-type: plaintext
>
>In <L9EUIQFK38652.5386458333@anonymous.poster> Nomen Nescio
><nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
>> I have been unable to find nym keys
>
>send emails to:
>remailer-keys@hod.aarg.net
>remailer-keys@blackhole.riot.eu.org
>remailer-keys@nym.alias.net
>remailer-keys@nym.at
>remailer-keys@nym.komite.net
>remailer-keys@nym.panta-rhei.eu.org
>
>and the nymservers will send you their keys.
>

not!

use

remailer-key